Differences as precursors to differentials

When Leibniz came to Paris in 1672, his mathematical knowledge was rather scant. It was through his acquaintance with Ch. Huygens, one of the leading mathematicians of his time in Europe, that Leibniz’s interest in Mathematics sparked. One of the problems that Huygens proposed was that of finding the sum of the series of the reciprocals of triangular numbers

\displaystyle{\frac 1{1}+\frac 1{3}+\frac 1{6}+\frac 1{10}+\dots.}

Realizing that the terms in the series were the successive differences between the terms of the sequence

\displaystyle{\frac 2{1}, \frac 2{2}, \frac 2{3},\dots.}

Leibniz concluded that the nth partial sums of the former sequence were equal to the difference between the (n+1)-th term and the first term of the latter, that is 1-\frac 2{n+1} (this device is what we call telescoping). He developed this idea, considering sequences of differences of differences (second differences), third differences, etc. Thus, one can move “up” and “down” along the sequence of successive differences, establishing relations between the sums of differences and the net change of the generating sequence.

Perhaps the simplest example is that of arithmetic sequences \{a_n\}. In this case, the sequence of differences is constant, b_n=a_{n+1}-a_n=d. The sum of the first n differences is just nd hence a_{n+1}-a_1=nd or a_{n+1}=a_1+nd. Arithmetic sequences are just linear functions of n.

Now, what if the differences of the original sequence form an arithmetic sequence and the second differences are constant?

Suppose the original sequence is a_1,a_2,\dots a_{n}, the sequence of first differences is b_1,b_2,\dots b_{n-1} where b_i=a_{i+1}-a_i and the sequence of second differences is c_1,c_2,\dots c_{n-2} with c_i=b_{i+1}-b_i=d, a constant. We know that \{b_i\} is an arithmetic sequence with difference d, hence b_i=b_1+(i-1)d. Hence

a_{n+1}-a_n=b_n=b_1+(n-1)d

a_{n}-a_{n-1}=b_{n-1}=b_1+(n-2)d,

\dots\dots

a_{2}-a_{1}=b_{1}

Adding all the relations above and taking into account the cancelations on the left hand side (telescopic effect) we obtain

a_{n+1}=a_1+nb_1+d(1+2+\dots +n-1)

or

\displaystyle{a_{n+1}=a_1+nb_1+d\frac{n(n-1)}{2}}\qquad\qquad (!)

Observe the following: a) a_n is given by a second degree polynomial; b) the free term is the first element of the sequence a_1, the coefficient of the linear term is b_1, the first “first difference”, and the coefficient of the quadratic part is d, which is the constant value of the second difference. At this point it should be clear that we can extend this procedure to the case when the third differences or, more generally, the differences of a certain order k are constant. Unsurprisingly, we get polynomials of degree equal to the order of the constant difference, where the coefficients only depend on the first values of consecutive differences. This is what we could call a “discrete” (and finite) Taylor series.

Leibniz was, above all, a philosopher. He realized that he could extend this methods to functions of a continuous variable. But then he would have to replace the differences by infinitesimal differences between to “successive” values of the variable. He had been thinking about the concept of infinitesimal for years, particularly through correspondence with Hobbes and his concept of “conatus“. All the pieces came together in his mind, leading to the creation of infinitesimal Calculus within a few years. Simultaneously, he introduced the notation for successive “differentials”: dy, d^2y, etc. and integrals (“summa omnia”) \int, \iint,\dots for the above processes of moving “down” and “up”, but this time applied to functions of a continuous variable. The passage n\to (n+1) becomes x\to x+dx. We deal with the continuous case in the next post.

Leave a comment